w h a t d o y o u k n o w a b o u t o p e n c l a w ? c a n w e i n s t a l l h e r e ? s h o u l d...

user 2026-02-19 23:07:27

w
h
a
t
 
d
o
 
y
o
u
 
k
n
o
w
 
a
b
o
u
t
 
o
p
e
n
c
l
a
w
?
 
c
a
n
 
w
e
 
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
 
h
e
r
e
?
 
s
h
o
u
l
d
 
i
t
 
b
e
 
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
 
l
o
c
a
l
l
y
 
o
r
 
o
n
 
t
h
e
 
r
e
m
o
t
e
 
s
e
r
v
e
r
?

assistant 2026-02-19 23:07:38 claude-sonnet-4-6

Let me also search the web directly for more current information.

assistant 2026-02-19 23:07:55 claude-sonnet-4-6

Now let me look at your current environment to assess what's best for installation.

assistant 2026-02-19 23:08:16 claude-sonnet-4-6

Here's what I found:

---

## What is OpenClaw?

**OpenClaw** (formerly "Clawdbot" / "Moltbot") is a **free, open-source autonomous AI agent** — essentially a personal AI assistant you self-host that can:

- Receive messages and execute multi-step tasks via LLMs
- Integrate with messaging channels: WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord, iMessage, Signal, Google Chat
- Automate workflows: intake forms, calendar booking, CRM updates, email
- Connect to tools via MCP integrations and Zapier (8,000+ apps)

It's especially interesting for your CRM context — there are documented use cases for **legal intake automation** (qualifying questions, booking consultations, CRM integration with GoHighLevel, Clio, etc.).

---

## Local vs. Remote Server?

**OpenClaw is designed to run on a server** (or always-on device), not a local developer machine, because:

- It needs to be **always listening** on messaging channels
- It runs as a **daemon** process
- It handles **inbound messages** and triggers workflows autonomously

So installing it on this server (`slpx2`) makes sense conceptually.

---

## Can We Install Here?

**There's a problem:** OpenClaw requires **Node >= 22**, but this server has **Node v10.19.0** — which is far too old.

Options:
1. **Upgrade Node.js** on this server to v22+ (using `nvm` or NodeSource)
2. **Run via Docker** (avoids the Node version conflict)
3. **Install on a separate server/VPS** dedicated to OpenClaw

Would you like to proceed with one of these approaches? Docker is probably the safest option since it won't disturb the existing Node/npm setup on this server.

---

Sources:
- [OpenClaw GitHub](https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw)
- [OpenClaw Official Site](https://openclaw.ai/)
- [OpenClaw Install Docs](https://docs.openclaw.ai/install)
- [OpenClaw npm Package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/openclaw)
- [OpenClaw Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenClaw)
- [OpenClaw for Legal Practices - My Legal Academy](https://mylegalacademy.com/kb/openclaw-mcp-integrations)
- [OpenClaw Review 2026 - Cybernews](https://cybernews.com/ai-tools/openclaw-review/)

user 2026-02-19 23:14:30

*
 
o
p
e
n
c
l
a
w
 
s
t
a
t
e
s
 
c
a
n
 
a
u
t
o
m
a
t
i
c
a
l
l
y
 
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
 
i
t
s
e
l
f


*
 
a
l
s
o
 
t
h
a
t
 
c
a
n
 
d
o
 
r
e
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
 
t
a
s
k
s
 
e
a
c
h
 
d
a
y


*
 
h
o
w
 
c
a
n
 
i
t
 
r
e
a
d
 
e
m
a
i
l
s
?


i
t
'
s
 
w
h
a
t
 
w
e
 
a
r
e
 
a
l
s
o
 
t
r
y
i
n
g
 
t
o
 
a
c
h
i
v
e
 
w
i
t
h
 
o
u
r
 
c
h
r
o
m
e
 
e
x
t
e
n
s
i
o
n
,
 
m
a
y
 
I
 
h
a
v
e
 
s
o
m
e
 
i
n
s
i
g
t
h
s
 
p
l
e
a
s
e
?

assistant 2026-02-19 23:14:32 claude-sonnet-4-6

Let me research these specific aspects in depth.

assistant 2026-02-19 23:14:51 claude-sonnet-4-6

Let me also look at your current project to understand what your Chrome extension is doing.

assistant 2026-02-19 23:15:35 claude-sonnet-4-6

Now I have a very clear picture. Here's a comprehensive breakdown:

---

## OpenClaw — The 3 Features You Asked About

### 1. Self-Improvement (Autonomous Skill Writing)

OpenClaw uses a **quasi-recursive model**:

1. You ask it to do something repeatedly
2. It detects the pattern and **writes its own Node.js code** (a new "skill")
3. Next time, it runs that skill locally — **no LLM token cost**, pure code execution
4. Skills accumulate, making the agent progressively more capable over time

This is essentially **code generation + caching of reasoning** — it trades expensive LLM calls for cheap local code runs.

---

### 2. Repetitive Daily Tasks — Cron Jobs

OpenClaw has a **built-in scheduler** (cron). You configure it in natural language or with cron expressions:

```
"Every weekday at 8 AM: check emails, summarize leads, update CRM"
0 9 * * 1-5  →  runs automatically
```

Output can be pushed back to a messaging channel (WhatsApp, Telegram, etc.). No manual triggering needed.

---

### 3. How It Reads Emails

Three methods, from simplest to most powerful:

| Method | How | Latency |
|---|---|---|
| **IMAP polling** | Connects like a mail client, checks every 1-5 min | ~minutes |
| **Gmail REST API + OAuth** | Uses Google's API, structured access to threads/labels | ~seconds |
| **Gmail Pub/Sub (webhook)** | Google pushes a notification to your server the instant mail arrives | **real-time** |

The OAuth flow: you create a Google Cloud project → enable Gmail API → generate credentials → paste into OpenClaw config → one browser sign-in → done. OpenClaw never stores your raw password.

---

## How This Compares to Your Chrome Extension

Your `gMailExt` extension (`Gmail Voice Reply Assistant`) already does something **very similar** but with a key architectural difference:

| | Your Extension | OpenClaw approach |
|---|---|---|
| **Where it runs** | Inside Chrome, user must have Gmail open | Server daemon, always running |
| **Email access** | Reads DOM from the Gmail page | Gmail API / IMAP / Pub/Sub |
| **AI** | Calls OpenAI directly (GPT-4o) | Pluggable — Claude, GPT, DeepSeek |
| **Scheduling** | Manual — user clicks | Cron jobs, fully automatic |
| **Reply drafting** | Yes (JSON `{summary, reply}`) | Yes |
| **Voice** | Yes (OpenAI Realtime) | No (text-based) |
| **Always-on** | No — only when Chrome is open | Yes |

### Key Insight for Your Project

The **biggest limitation** of your Chrome extension approach is that it **requires Chrome to be open and the user to be on Gmail**. OpenClaw solves this by reading email server-side via the Gmail API.

**What you could borrow from OpenClaw's approach:**
1. **Gmail API + OAuth** on your backend server — lets you read/process emails without Chrome being open
2. **Scheduled server-side processing** — run email analysis via cron, push results to your CRM automatically
3. **Webhook-driven** — process emails the instant they arrive (Pub/Sub), not waiting for the user

Your voice feature is actually something OpenClaw *doesn't* have — that's a differentiator worth keeping.

---

Sources:
- [OpenClaw Architecture - innFactory](https://innfactory.ai/en/blog/openclaw-architecture-explained/)
- [OpenClaw Cron Jobs Docs](https://docs.openclaw.ai/automation/cron-jobs)
- [OpenClaw Gmail Pub/Sub Docs](https://docs.openclaw.ai/automation/gmail-pubsub)
- [OpenClaw Gmail Integration Guide](https://www.getopenclaw.ai/help/email-gmail-integration)
- [OpenClaw Self-Improvement - DigitalOcean](https://www.digitalocean.com/resources/articles/what-is-openclaw)
- [OpenClaw Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenClaw)

user 2026-02-19 23:27:28

o
n
 
t
h
i
s
 
c
o
m
p
 
c
a
n
 
w
e
 
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
 
o
p
e
n
c
l
a
w
?

assistant 2026-02-19 23:27:30 claude-sonnet-4-6

Let me check the system requirements more thoroughly.

assistant 2026-02-19 23:27:51 claude-sonnet-4-6

**Short answer: not recommended right now.** Here's why:

---

## System Check Results

| Requirement | Needed | Current | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Node.js | >= 22 | v10.19.0 | **FAIL** |
| Docker | optional | not installed | unavailable |
| RAM | ~1GB free | 502MB free (1.8GB available) | marginal |
| **Disk space** | several GB | **1.4GB free (97% full)** | **CRITICAL** |

---

## The Real Blockers

### 1. Disk is almost full (97% used — only 1.4GB free)
This is the most serious problem. Installing Node 22 alone would take ~200MB, and OpenClaw with its dependencies (npm packages) would likely need 500MB–1GB more. **You'd likely run out of disk mid-install and corrupt things.**

### 2. Node.js is v10 — needs v22
A major version upgrade is required. This is doable with `nvm`, but risky on a nearly-full disk.

---

## Recommendation

Before even attempting OpenClaw here, you'd need to:

1. **Free up disk space** — the server is at 97%, that needs to be addressed regardless
2. **Upgrade Node.js** to v22 via `nvm`
3. Then install OpenClaw

Want me to help identify what's taking up disk space so we can clean it up first? That would be the logical first step.

user 2026-02-19 23:28:46

p
l
s
 
f
i
n
d
 
t
h
e
 
s
p
a
c
e
 
i
s
s
u
e

assistant 2026-02-19 23:35:36 claude-sonnet-4-6

Found it. The picture is very clear:

---

## Space Hogs — Summary

### In `bMonV3/` alone = **21GB** of mostly log files:

| File | Size |
|---|---|
| `__ddbg_room_props.log` | **14 GB** |
| `__ddbgReults.log` | **3.5 GB** |
| `__daily_scraper.log` | **1.9 GB** |
| `__load_balancing.log` | 607 MB |
| `logs2/` folder | 578 MB |
| `__ddbgHotelRun.log` | 229 MB |
| `logs/` folder | 68 MB |

### Other bloat:
| Location | Size | Type |
|---|---|---|
| `extension2/__ddbg_room_props.log` | 170 MB | log |
| `/var/log/apache2` | 269 MB | system logs |
| `/var/log/mongodb` | 253 MB | system logs |
| `/var/log/zabbix` | 203 MB | system logs |

---

## Quick Win: Clearing just the debug logs in `bMonV3/` would free ~**20GB**

Those `__ddbg*.log` files are debug/scraper logs — safe to truncate (not delete, in case processes are writing to them). 

Want me to truncate them? I'll use `truncate -s 0` which empties the file without deleting it (so any running process won't break). That alone should bring the disk from 97% to well under 50%.

user 2026-02-19 23:35:36

<
t
a
s
k
-
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
>


<
t
a
s
k
-
i
d
>
b
c
a
a
c
8
6
<
/
t
a
s
k
-
i
d
>


<
o
u
t
p
u
t
-
f
i
l
e
>
/
t
m
p
/
c
l
a
u
d
e
-
0
/
-
v
a
r
-
w
w
w
-
m
s
s
q
l
-
d
a
n
m
a
r
c
r
m
-
c
o
m
-
d
e
v
1
/
t
a
s
k
s
/
b
c
a
a
c
8
6
.
o
u
t
p
u
t
<
/
o
u
t
p
u
t
-
f
i
l
e
>


<
s
t
a
t
u
s
>
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
<
/
s
t
a
t
u
s
>


<
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
>
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
 
c
o
m
m
a
n
d
 
"
C
h
e
c
k
 
a
l
l
 
v
a
r
/
w
w
w
 
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
i
e
s
"
 
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
 
(
e
x
i
t
 
c
o
d
e
 
0
)
<
/
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
>


<
/
t
a
s
k
-
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
>


R
e
a
d
 
t
h
e
 
o
u
t
p
u
t
 
f
i
l
e
 
t
o
 
r
e
t
r
i
e
v
e
 
t
h
e
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
:
 
/
t
m
p
/
c
l
a
u
d
e
-
0
/
-
v
a
r
-
w
w
w
-
m
s
s
q
l
-
d
a
n
m
a
r
c
r
m
-
c
o
m
-
d
e
v
1
/
t
a
s
k
s
/
b
c
a
a
c
8
6
.
o
u
t
p
u
t

assistant 2026-02-19 23:35:47 claude-sonnet-4-6

The full `/var/www` breakdown adds more context. The server is carrying a lot:

| Directory | Size |
|---|---|
| `hansen.danmarcrm.com` | 83 GB |
| `mssql.danmarcrm.com` | 71 GB |
| `mysql` | 57 GB |
| `homefrontbrands.danmarcrm.com` | 17 GB |
| `newgen` | 16 GB |
| `__fromFreeCRM` | 12 GB |
| `bkhsazureSugarEnt` | 9.2 GB |
| `swapfile` x3 | 24 GB (3 × 8.1GB swap files!) |

---

The disk is 38GB total, but this server clearly has **way more data than that** — which means much of it must be on a different mount/partition. The 38GB root partition (`/dev/sda1`) is what's at 97%.

The **immediate fix** is still the same: those debug logs in `bMonV3/` are eating ~20GB of the root partition.

**Shall I go ahead and truncate the debug logs in `bMonV3/`?** These files:

```
bMonV3/__ddbg_room_props.log   → 14 GB
bMonV3/__ddbgReults.log        →  3.5 GB
bMonV3/__daily_scraper.log     →  1.9 GB
bMonV3/__load_balancing.log    →  607 MB
bMonV3/__ddbgHotelRun.log      →  229 MB
```

That would recover roughly **20 GB** in one shot and bring the disk well below 50% usage. Just confirm and I'll do it safely with `truncate -s 0`.

user 2026-02-19 23:41:37

p
l
s
 
s
e
a
r
c
h
 
l
o
c
a
l
 
c
o
m
p
 
t
o
o
 
h
e
r
e
 
w
e
 
a
r
e
 
h
a
v
i
n
g
 
a
 
s
p
a
c
e
 
i
s
s
u
e
 
t
o
o

assistant 2026-02-19 23:53:14 claude-sonnet-4-6

Here's the full picture across **both disks**:

---

## Two Disks, Both Nearly Full

| Disk | Size | Used | Free | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| `/dev/sda1` (root) | 38 GB | 35 GB | **1.3 GB** | **97%** |
| `/dev/sdb` (`/var/www`) | 345 GB | 325 GB | **5.3 GB** | **99%** |

---

## `/dev/sdb` — Top Space Users (345GB disk, 99% full)

### `hansen.danmarcrm.com` — 83 GB
| Path | Size |
|---|---|
| `__downloadedFiles/` | **50 GB** |
| `logs/` | **23 GB** |
| `__fileRequestsHistory/` | 3.5 GB |
| `ddbgHSReqs.log` | 511 MB |
| `__ddbgFileDDD...log` | 355 MB |
| Various other `__ddbg*.log` | ~600 MB |

### `mysql/` — 57 GB (actual database files)
| DB | Size |
|---|---|
| `mssql` | 15 GB |
| `finservdna` | 9.2 GB |
| `homefrontbrands` | 8.3 GB |
| `booking_analysis` | 7.4 GB |
| `newgen1` | 5.4 GB |

### Other big items
| Path | Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| `swapfile` x3 | **24 GB** | 3 swap files — likely redundant |
| `mssql.danmarcrm.com/bMonV3/__ddbg*.log` | ~20 GB | Debug logs |
| `__fromFreeCRM/` | 12 GB | Old migration data? |
| `bkhsazureSugarEnt/` | 9.2 GB | Old backup? |

---

## Safest Quick Wins (without touching databases or active code)

| Action | Est. Recovery | Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Truncate `bMonV3/__ddbg*.log` files | ~20 GB | Very low |
| Truncate `hansen/__ddbg*.log` files | ~2 GB | Very low |
| Truncate `hansen/logs/` old logs | up to 23 GB | Low (check age first) |
| Review 3x swapfiles (likely only need 1) | up to 16 GB | Medium |
| Review `__downloadedFiles/` (50 GB) | up to 50 GB | Check with you first |

**The debug log truncations alone could recover ~22 GB safely.** Want me to proceed with those first?

user 2026-02-19 23:53:15

<
t
a
s
k
-
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
>


<
t
a
s
k
-
i
d
>
b
e
c
5
a
4
b
<
/
t
a
s
k
-
i
d
>


<
o
u
t
p
u
t
-
f
i
l
e
>
/
t
m
p
/
c
l
a
u
d
e
-
0
/
-
v
a
r
-
w
w
w
-
m
s
s
q
l
-
d
a
n
m
a
r
c
r
m
-
c
o
m
-
d
e
v
1
/
t
a
s
k
s
/
b
e
c
5
a
4
b
.
o
u
t
p
u
t
<
/
o
u
t
p
u
t
-
f
i
l
e
>


<
s
t
a
t
u
s
>
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
<
/
s
t
a
t
u
s
>


<
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
>
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
 
c
o
m
m
a
n
d
 
"
T
o
p
 
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
i
e
s
 
o
n
 
/
d
e
v
/
s
d
b
 
(
v
a
r
/
w
w
w
)
"
 
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
 
(
e
x
i
t
 
c
o
d
e
 
0
)
<
/
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
>


<
/
t
a
s
k
-
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
>


R
e
a
d
 
t
h
e
 
o
u
t
p
u
t
 
f
i
l
e
 
t
o
 
r
e
t
r
i
e
v
e
 
t
h
e
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
:
 
/
t
m
p
/
c
l
a
u
d
e
-
0
/
-
v
a
r
-
w
w
w
-
m
s
s
q
l
-
d
a
n
m
a
r
c
r
m
-
c
o
m
-
d
e
v
1
/
t
a
s
k
s
/
b
e
c
5
a
4
b
.
o
u
t
p
u
t

assistant 2026-02-19 23:53:29 claude-sonnet-4-6

Nothing new — this confirms what we already found. The numbers match exactly.

---

To summarize both disks cleanly:

## Full Space Map

**`/dev/sdb` (`/var/www`) — 345GB, 99% full**

| # | Path | Size | What it likely is |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | `hansen.danmarcrm.com/` | 83 GB | Active site — but 50GB downloaded files + 23GB logs |
| 2 | `mysql/` | 57 GB | Live databases — don't touch |
| 3 | `mssql.danmarcrm.com/` | 52 GB | Active site — 20GB is debug logs |
| 4 | `homefrontbrands.danmarcrm.com/` | 17 GB | Site |
| 5 | `newgen/` | 16 GB | Site |
| 6 | `__fromFreeCRM/` | 12 GB | Old migration data |
| 7 | `bkhsazureSugarEnt/` | 9.2 GB | Old backup |
| 8 | `swapfile` x3 | **24 GB** | 3 swap files — probably only need 1 |
| 9 | `__logsAndFilesHansenMoved09152024` | 3.1 GB | Old archived logs from Sept 2024 |
| 10 | `comp_danm_iah_toupdate4.sql` | 1.3 GB | Loose SQL dump file |

**`/dev/sda1` (root `/`) — 38GB, 97% full**

| Path | Size |
|---|---|
| `/var/log/apache2` | 269 MB |
| `/var/log/mongodb` | 253 MB |
| `/var/log/zabbix` | 203 MB |

---

## Recommended Cleanup Plan (ask before each group)

| Priority | Action | Recovers | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| **1 — Safe** | Truncate `__ddbg*.log` in `bMonV3/` | ~20 GB | None |
| **2 — Safe** | Truncate `__ddbg*.log` in `hansen/` | ~2 GB | None |
| **3 — Check** | Review `hansen/__downloadedFiles/` | up to 50 GB | Need your call |
| **4 — Check** | Review `hansen/logs/` | up to 23 GB | Check age first |
| **5 — Check** | Remove 2 of the 3 swapfiles | ~16 GB | Confirm which to keep |
| **6 — Check** | Delete `__logsAndFilesHansenMoved09152024` | 3.1 GB | Archived Sept 2024 |
| **7 — Check** | Delete `comp_danm_iah_toupdate4.sql` | 1.3 GB | Loose SQL dump |
| **8 — Check** | Review `__fromFreeCRM/` + `bkhsazureSugarEnt/` | 21 GB | Old backups? |

**Want me to start with priority 1 — truncating the debug logs in `bMonV3/`?** That's the safest 20GB win with zero risk.

user 2026-02-19 23:53:29

<
t
a
s
k
-
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
>


<
t
a
s
k
-
i
d
>
b
7
e
1
9
9
c
<
/
t
a
s
k
-
i
d
>


<
o
u
t
p
u
t
-
f
i
l
e
>
/
t
m
p
/
c
l
a
u
d
e
-
0
/
-
v
a
r
-
w
w
w
-
m
s
s
q
l
-
d
a
n
m
a
r
c
r
m
-
c
o
m
-
d
e
v
1
/
t
a
s
k
s
/
b
7
e
1
9
9
c
.
o
u
t
p
u
t
<
/
o
u
t
p
u
t
-
f
i
l
e
>


<
s
t
a
t
u
s
>
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
<
/
s
t
a
t
u
s
>


<
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
>
B
a
c
k
g
r
o
u
n
d
 
c
o
m
m
a
n
d
 
"
T
o
p
 
d
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
i
e
s
 
o
n
 
r
o
o
t
 
p
a
r
t
i
t
i
o
n
"
 
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
 
(
e
x
i
t
 
c
o
d
e
 
0
)
<
/
s
u
m
m
a
r
y
>


<
/
t
a
s
k
-
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
>


R
e
a
d
 
t
h
e
 
o
u
t
p
u
t
 
f
i
l
e
 
t
o
 
r
e
t
r
i
e
v
e
 
t
h
e
 
r
e
s
u
l
t
:
 
/
t
m
p
/
c
l
a
u
d
e
-
0
/
-
v
a
r
-
w
w
w
-
m
s
s
q
l
-
d
a
n
m
a
r
c
r
m
-
c
o
m
-
d
e
v
1
/
t
a
s
k
s
/
b
7
e
1
9
9
c
.
o
u
t
p
u
t

assistant 2026-02-19 23:53:35 claude-sonnet-4-6

No new surprises there. It confirms the root partition breakdown:

| Path | Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| `/var/www` | 306 GB | Mounted on `/dev/sdb` — already analyzed |
| `/var/lib` | **21 GB** | System libraries, DB engines — worth checking |
| `/var/log` | 1 GB | Apache, MongoDB, Zabbix logs |
| `/var/cache` | 126 MB | Safe to clear |

One thing worth drilling into — `/var/lib` at **21 GB** on the root partition is notable. Let me check what's in there:

assistant 2026-02-19 23:53:45 claude-sonnet-4-6

This adds more to the picture:

| Path | Size | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| `/var/lib/mysql` | **15 GB** | MySQL data dir on root partition |
| `/var/lib/mongodb` | **5.6 GB** | MongoDB data on root partition |

So you actually have **two separate MySQL locations** — `/var/lib/mysql` (15GB on root) and `/var/www/mysql` (57GB on the data disk). Both are eating space.

---

## Updated Full Picture

**Root disk (`/dev/sda1`, 38GB, 97% full) — what's actually using it:**

| Path | Size |
|---|---|
| `/var/lib/mysql` | 15 GB — MySQL on root |
| `/var/lib/mongodb` | 5.6 GB — MongoDB on root |
| `/var/log` | 1 GB — system logs |
| rest of OS | ~14 GB |

**The root disk is tight because MySQL and MongoDB are sitting on it**, not on the larger `/dev/sdb` data disk.

---

## Priority Cleanup Plan (revised)

| Priority | Action | Recovers | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| **1 — Safe now** | Truncate `__ddbg*.log` in `bMonV3/` | ~20 GB (on sdb) | None |
| **2 — Safe now** | Truncate `__ddbg*.log` in `hansen/` | ~2 GB (on sdb) | None |
| **3 — Medium** | Clear `/var/log` old logs | ~800 MB (on root) | Low |
| **4 — Discuss** | Move MySQL/MongoDB data dir to `/dev/sdb` | ~21 GB freed on root | Needs planning |
| **5 — Discuss** | Review swapfiles x3 on sdb | ~16 GB | Confirm which to keep |
| **6 — Discuss** | `hansen/__downloadedFiles/` + `logs/` | up to 73 GB | Need your call |

**Ready to start with priority 1 — truncate the `bMonV3` debug logs?** Just say the word.

user 2026-02-19 23:55:45

c
a
n
 
y
o
u
 
a
l
s
o
 
c
h
e
c
k
 
t
h
e
 
l
o
c
a
l
 
c
o
m
p
u
t
e
r
?
 
n
o
t
 
t
h
e
 
r
e
m
o
t
e
 
s
s
h
?

assistant 2026-02-19 23:55:49 claude-sonnet-4-6

I don't have access to your local computer — I'm running entirely on the remote server (`slpx2`) via SSH. I can only see and interact with what's on this server.

To check your local machine's disk space you'd need to run these yourself:

**On Mac:**
```bash
df -h
du -sh ~/* | sort -rh | head -20
```

**On Windows:**
- Open **File Explorer** → right-click each drive → Properties
- Or run in PowerShell: `Get-PSDrive -PSProvider FileSystem`

**On Linux:**
```bash
df -h
du -sh /home/* | sort -rh | head -20
```

Once you run those and share the output, I can help you interpret and plan a cleanup — just paste the results here.